Once a quarter, we sat down and rated team members on two dimensions: work performance and social behaviour. Each received a score from 1 to 10. The assessment was relatively informal, with room for individual judgement. We used these ratings mainly to follow development over time. Looking across several quarters helped us notice who worked…
Structured learning programs felt like real development. The team kept reaching for short courses and coaching instead, and they were mostly right. A note on the founder’s time horizon, and what AI changes about it.
We thought our onboarding developed people. Mostly we hired self-starters and paid for external coaches. A note on misattribution.